<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ATTN Nokia &#8211; Why The Bulk?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://s60blog.com/2009/01/attn-nokia-why-the-bulk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://s60blog.com/2009/01/attn-nokia-why-the-bulk/</link>
	<description>A Huge Resource for Editorials, Reviews, Guides &#38; Videos for Symbian Powered Devices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:00:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: marymc</title>
		<link>http://s60blog.com/2009/01/attn-nokia-why-the-bulk/#comment-4373</link>
		<dc:creator>marymc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s60blog.com/?p=1584#comment-4373</guid>
		<description>I have the 5800 and people seem to think it&#039;s bulky or plastic-y. Having owned it for a month, I don&#039;t think either. It doesn&#039;t feel plasticy or breakable. I don&#039;t think a phone HAS to have metal on it. It&#039;s also not very big at all. The touchscreen is a good size, but the phone is very neat.

That said, some of the phones up there ARE pretty fat. But then, Blackberry and iPhone are very wide. They&#039;re slim, sure, but it&#039;s a lot easier to hold the Nokias in one hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the 5800 and people seem to think it&#8217;s bulky or plastic-y. Having owned it for a month, I don&#8217;t think either. It doesn&#8217;t feel plasticy or breakable. I don&#8217;t think a phone HAS to have metal on it. It&#8217;s also not very big at all. The touchscreen is a good size, but the phone is very neat.</p>
<p>That said, some of the phones up there ARE pretty fat. But then, Blackberry and iPhone are very wide. They&#8217;re slim, sure, but it&#8217;s a lot easier to hold the Nokias in one hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alam</title>
		<link>http://s60blog.com/2009/01/attn-nokia-why-the-bulk/#comment-4230</link>
		<dc:creator>Alam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s60blog.com/?p=1584#comment-4230</guid>
		<description>I had N82. I liked it very much, it was bulk. world is changing so fast that I hope to get slim like 5220 Xprees Music and minimum same power as N82 and Surely Touch like 5800</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had N82. I liked it very much, it was bulk. world is changing so fast that I hope to get slim like 5220 Xprees Music and minimum same power as N82 and Surely Touch like 5800</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Umat</title>
		<link>http://s60blog.com/2009/01/attn-nokia-why-the-bulk/#comment-4220</link>
		<dc:creator>Umat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s60blog.com/?p=1584#comment-4220</guid>
		<description>I Love nokia Phones the thing they are bulky doesnt matter. The thing em wooried of why nokia symbian softwares are slow. Most of the time they do hang up and restarts automatically. I am currently using Nokia E90. I love it and i did never expect the same software prob by this cell but it do restart automatically somtimes when i listen music with Edge... :D

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Love nokia Phones the thing they are bulky doesnt matter. The thing em wooried of why nokia symbian softwares are slow. Most of the time they do hang up and restarts automatically. I am currently using Nokia E90. I love it and i did never expect the same software prob by this cell but it do restart automatically somtimes when i listen music with Edge&#8230; <img src='http://s60blog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sehaj</title>
		<link>http://s60blog.com/2009/01/attn-nokia-why-the-bulk/#comment-4152</link>
		<dc:creator>sehaj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s60blog.com/?p=1584#comment-4152</guid>
		<description>@ sameal those were some really hard-hitting comments good wrk 

Keep them coming guys awesome job.. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ sameal those were some really hard-hitting comments good wrk </p>
<p>Keep them coming guys awesome job.. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ani</title>
		<link>http://s60blog.com/2009/01/attn-nokia-why-the-bulk/#comment-4150</link>
		<dc:creator>Ani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 10:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s60blog.com/?p=1584#comment-4150</guid>
		<description>yeah lets keep our fingers crossed ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah lets keep our fingers crossed <img src='http://s60blog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bossrulez</title>
		<link>http://s60blog.com/2009/01/attn-nokia-why-the-bulk/#comment-4149</link>
		<dc:creator>bossrulez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 08:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s60blog.com/?p=1584#comment-4149</guid>
		<description>I think we are going to see something soon in 2009, from NOKIA in this regards.

Something like the N97 without the QWERTY keyboard and the bulk.

The technology is already there, they just have to package it well.

Lets keep our fingers crossed :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we are going to see something soon in 2009, from NOKIA in this regards.</p>
<p>Something like the N97 without the QWERTY keyboard and the bulk.</p>
<p>The technology is already there, they just have to package it well.</p>
<p>Lets keep our fingers crossed <img src='http://s60blog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stefan</title>
		<link>http://s60blog.com/2009/01/attn-nokia-why-the-bulk/#comment-4141</link>
		<dc:creator>stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s60blog.com/?p=1584#comment-4141</guid>
		<description>I cannot name one phone, who has the same capabilities , and look thin or pretty.

The xperia looks Ok, but doesn&#039;t have the same amount of hardware.

The Instinct looks shiny but, as big as the N97, and without qwerty...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot name one phone, who has the same capabilities , and look thin or pretty.</p>
<p>The xperia looks Ok, but doesn&#8217;t have the same amount of hardware.</p>
<p>The Instinct looks shiny but, as big as the N97, and without qwerty&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samael</title>
		<link>http://s60blog.com/2009/01/attn-nokia-why-the-bulk/#comment-4139</link>
		<dc:creator>Samael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s60blog.com/?p=1584#comment-4139</guid>
		<description>I agree. N85 is way better. Better hardware, less memory though and cheaper.
My 2 favorite phones are E71 and E51, both from E-series (sorry E66 funs but i don&#039;t like slides). For me all the N phones are fugly cause are bulky and made with toy like plastic. Thank god for iPhone. Nokia needed a slap to wake up and learn what style means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. N85 is way better. Better hardware, less memory though and cheaper.<br />
My 2 favorite phones are E71 and E51, both from E-series (sorry E66 funs but i don&#8217;t like slides). For me all the N phones are fugly cause are bulky and made with toy like plastic. Thank god for iPhone. Nokia needed a slap to wake up and learn what style means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CHAPLINbyCarlos</title>
		<link>http://s60blog.com/2009/01/attn-nokia-why-the-bulk/#comment-4137</link>
		<dc:creator>CHAPLINbyCarlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s60blog.com/?p=1584#comment-4137</guid>
		<description>I have that thought too for a long time ago, and Nokia stays behind SE and Motorola in those cases, look and software..  They might not be that good, comparing to Nokia, but they have the middle term</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have that thought too for a long time ago, and Nokia stays behind SE and Motorola in those cases, look and software..  They might not be that good, comparing to Nokia, but they have the middle term</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ammar</title>
		<link>http://s60blog.com/2009/01/attn-nokia-why-the-bulk/#comment-4122</link>
		<dc:creator>Ammar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s60blog.com/?p=1584#comment-4122</guid>
		<description>i hope the next Communicator will be thin but its a bonus not an important factor,i still prefer the functions and specifications over the looks,i know am a heavy user but also there are thousands of thin and nice looking phones from Nokia. If i wanna Communicator with the thickness of 5310 XM then i need to wait for ages till technology can satisfy my needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hope the next Communicator will be thin but its a bonus not an important factor,i still prefer the functions and specifications over the looks,i know am a heavy user but also there are thousands of thin and nice looking phones from Nokia. If i wanna Communicator with the thickness of 5310 XM then i need to wait for ages till technology can satisfy my needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.792 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-09-08 10:36:59 -->
